by Paul Barnes
(Brisbane Australia)

I've played with Rosetta Stone in Version 2 and then more seriously in Version 3. I note that the comments above are based on Version 2 and perhaps some other comments about poor relationship with R S. I agree with some of the comments as applying to my experience with V2 but not particularly applicable to V3 which I have found a much technologically improved product.

I think RS is a very capable product in Version 3. I am about to start supplementing my study with the Audio Companion which was not available in the earliest release of V3 in late 2007.

I'm surprised that you two years after the first release of V3 haven't followed through on your commitment to review Version 3. It is a markedly better product and I think your comments are lacking in validity without some specific detail related to Version 3.

If I've missed relevant information in saying this, please let me know

Click here to post comments

Return to Copy of Rosetta Stone Review.

Enjoy this page? Please pay it forward. Here's how...

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

  1. Click on the HTML link code below.
  2. Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.
[?]Subscribe To This Site
  • follow us in feedly
  • Add to My Yahoo!
Donate Bitcoins