Version 3

by Dustin H
(Tulsa, OK)

I have used every version of Rosetta Stone since it came out. The original two versions were novel in the way that they associated images with sounds and words, but at the same time, I felt as though they were lacking. Writing, especially in non-roman scripts, was completely neglected and was not worth looking at. The speakers often had odd pronunciations unlike what my actual language teachers spoke. They did however give me a good base to work off of.

Version 3, in my opinion, has fixed many of these problems. The writing system is much more robust, figuring out what to do and what order to go in is now handled for you, and it even sets up what lessons you should do each day based on how much time you have and how fast you want to learn.

For all those burned by the lackluster support of the previous versions, I suggest checking out 3. I like it a lot better and I'm glad they got their act together.

Click here to post comments

Return to Copy of Rosetta Stone Review.

Enjoy this page? Please pay it forward. Here's how...

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

  1. Click on the HTML link code below.
  2. Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.
[?]Subscribe To This Site
  • follow us in feedly
  • Add to My Yahoo!
Donate Bitcoins